September 26th, 2013
06:00 AM ET
Details.com editor James Oliver Cury tackles controversial food-and-drink-themed etiquette issues.
I grew up in New York City during the 1970s and 1980s, eating out and drinking regularly several nights a week. I vividly recall what it was like to be near smokers, whether it was my friends sucking down cloves at the bars (we were 14), weird old men immersed in a smoky haze at the local coffee shop, or grandpa Ed lighting up a cigar at the fancy seafood joint (he gave me the band to wear as a ring, so I was cool with it).
I never liked smoke or smoking, but the law didn’t forbid it back then and people just accepted it as a part of our culture, like being near a smelly person who doesn’t use deodorant. What are you going to do? Outlaw that? Part of the ritual of going out was coming home smelling like smoke - and hoping no one would light up at a good restaurant and impose cigarette smell on the rest of us.
A few days ago, a related debate emerged: Should e-cigarettes be banned from restaurants? The topic has ruffled feathers among smokers, diners, servers, restaurateurs, chefs...and lawyers. My first reaction was: No one will be able to ban these contraptions, no matter how unsightly they are unless they can prove that e-cigarettes directly interfere with the customer experience or worker health.
And from what I can tell, e-cigs don’t smell awful, don’t invade clothes, and don’t leave ash or stubs or even smoke. Yes, they look a little silly, but if it helps someone stop real smoking (which is harmful for many reasons beyond the fact that there’s nicotine in the product), then who cares if someone lights up one of these pretend smokes? They’re like toothpicks in that respect, and you can’t ban tacky.
Below are some facts that shed light on the issue. Personally, e-cigs remind me a lot of chewing gum. I wouldn’t use the stuff in a nice restaurant, but I also wouldn’t advocate banning the practice outright.
E-cigarettes don’t stink
E-cigarettes are kinda green in theory
E-cigarettes are tacky and dorky
E-cigarettes have nicotine but none of the other harmful ingredients of normal cigs
The law is murky
E-cigarettes may keep smokers from leaving the table and smoking outside
More from Details:
« Previous entryIn New Mexico, choose a side: red or green
soundoff (859 Responses)« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
« Previous entryIn New Mexico, choose a side: red or green
So much lack of informing oneself went into this article... To mention just a couple...
'Vapor' can smell just as much or more than 'smoke'. Saying that it won't smell because it's 'vapor' is just flat-out wrong. There is smell. Some people can smell it, some can't. Apparently the author is one of the lucky ones who can't.
There is a clear implication by the author that the e-cigs contain no harmful substances. That is overstepping a bit. They may not have the previously identified harmful substances in traditional cigarettes, but they have more than pure nicotine, and some do contain some substances which have been shown to be harmful.
So we push the reset button, and those of us who want to avoid such things are forced to start the same cycle that led to the current state of affairs of cigarettes and restaurants. There was a day when restaurants didn't bother even to have smoking and non-smoking sections, and the only recourse was to complain to management and choose not to patronize restaurants that allowed it. Just as then, that will be my recourse with e-cigs until they are banned the same as cigarettes.
How dare anyone expose me to minute amounts of exhaled nicotine while I consume my sodium and fat-laden 3,900 calorie meal that has been washed down with six gin cocktails? The nerve of those selfish vapers!
Oh, and stop calling it "vapor." Water vapor is invisible.
Like clouds, yeah...
The electronic cigarette is the safest and healthiest alternative that will help you get rid of the bad habit of smoking! You should make a thorough online research and see which the best electronic cigarette available is. The best thing you can do is to purchase a starter kit, because there you will have all the accessories that you need in order to enjoy your new healthy smoking habit.
People have a right to smoke and not smoke, why not create a space for both? Learn about both at http://helpingquitsmoking.com
I don't see the point in them. But honestly I am angry. 6 years ago I made a website selli8ng them and was number one on google all over the world for the keywords buy electronic cigarette and I guess I was into it too early and forgot about it. Noone seemed to know about them back then. I always keep my ear to the ground about new things coming up but now there are shops selling just them and people show me them. The affiliate I was with only paid 5% on sales so I just didn't bother with it. I moved into another new idea before anyone else realises that is youtube advertising money on music videos.
try our $5 disposable eCigs at http://fivecigs.com
electronic cigarette here to take advantage of the economic
Electronic cigarate is a popular cigarate.cigarate makes nicotin and tobaco that is harmful for health.i appear that ur site is so fantastic others sites.
I don't think that restaurants should be able to sell e-ciggs as food because, if you eat one, you could get sick. You're supposed to smoke, not eat them. So yes, I think they should ban e-ciggs being on restaurant menu's.
Doesn't say anything about secondhand smoke or vapor which is why smoking is prohibited in public places. It just talks about fluff like it doesn't smell. BUT IS IT HARMFUL TO OTHERS? Is the question. I don't know, and the author doesn't say, so why is he polling us afterwards? Duh. Write better articles kid. From the sound of things it needs to become FDA regulated, studies done, and then a decision can be made. Until then, ban em all.
Studies have been done concerning second hand vapor. Check the comments below.
I don't think that E-cigarettes should be banned from Hotels & Restaurants. Because people are moreover addicted to those traditional cigarettes. So, rather than smoking them it's far better to smoke E-cigarettes. If you have any issue for E-cigarettes relates checkout here: http://www.magnifecig.co.uk/
E Cigarette is in great demand and I guess E cig should not banned from restaurant . Deluxevapes is selling E cig and e liqud and know the demand of E cig very well and this is the perfect alternate for tobacco. which helps to stay away from tobacco addiction.
E cigarette do not produce smoker. Instead of smoke it produce water vapor which is not harmful to health of any one. So it can be smoke at any restaurant because there is no risk to the health of any person sitting in restaurant. According to me there should be no banned on using of e cig in public places.
Cigs is cigs. If you need your binky that badly, stay home and curl up with it in your crib. I don't pick my nose in public because it's socially unacceptable. Smoking has also become socially unacceptable. Live with it.
To BECS, hurry up and finish that online English writing class. Your electronic customers will appreciate it, too.
Socially unaccepted? I wouldn't call that a fact, merely a wish from a minority of intolerant individuals. If you do not believe me, I suggest you look at the poll.
OMFG, get off your high horse son. Your ignorance is showing, it's NOT smoking so don't call it that. The only reason it's 'socially unacceptable' is because of control freaks like yourself. Do you drive a car? Use electricity? How about plastic products? The production and/or use of all of them release harmful chemicals into the atmosphere so if you do use any of them, you are a hypocrite. FYI, I doubt that the poster Best e-cig store uses English as his/her first language. Learn some manners.
I'm not even a smoker and see you as nothing but an annoying little sh!t.
I think E-Cigarettes should follow the same standards as cigarettes , and saftey awarness.
You cannot comparing tobacco cigs to e-cigs with any kind of integrity or honesty. They ONLY thing they have in common is that e-cigs can deliver nicotine to the user but not to a bystander.
I think they did it that way to try and steal smokers from cigarette companies by making it more attractive to smokers and giving smokers an alternative. I agree that it creates a bit of a stigma, but it also has its positive side,